Logo Uni Augsburg


Jean-Monnet-Centre of Excellence


In its ‘Quelle’ judgment, the German Federal Court of Justice addressed the issue how national law can be interpreted and methodically developed in conformity with European directives. Most notably in its second headnote, the Court defines the requirements for a purpose-oriented reduction (teleologische Reduktion) as tool for the methodical development of law. The case concerns the sale of consumer goods (paragraph 474(1), sentence 1 BGB). It deals with the issue, whether – according to paragraph 439(4) BGB (§439(5) BGB since 1.1.2018) and paragraph 346(1) BGB – a seller delivering a replacement may require the purchaser to surrender any benefits received, or to receive compensation for the use of the defective goods.

The European Court of Justice was asked for preliminary ruling on the question, whether the seller was enjoined from claiming any such rights due to article 3(2) in conjunction with article 3(3), sentence 1 and article 3(4) or article 3(3), sentence 3 of Directive 1999/44/EG of the European Parliament and the advice of the European Council of May 25, 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of, and guarantees in respect of, consumer goods (Official Journal L 171, 07/07/1999, p. 12).

The European Court of Justice positively confirmed this question. Accordingly, the German Federal Court of Justice concluded, that – due to the principle of conformity with European law – paragraph 439(4) BGB (or §439(5) BGB since 1.1.2018) must be interpreted restrictively. Just a month after the pronouncement of judgment, the German lawmaker rendered the relevant paragraphs of the BGB accordingly. Now paragraph 474(2) BGB (now 475 (3) BGB), contain no right to claim back benefits received, or receive compensation for the use of the defective goods in case of replacement in consumer sales.

For further reading see Möllers, Juristische Methodenlehre, München 2017, § 8 Rn. 55 ff.


Quelle-Rechtsprechung BGH, Urt. v. 26.11.2008, VIII ZR 200/05 – Quelle-Rechtsprechung = BGHZ 179, 27-43; ZIP 2009, 176-181; NJW 2009, 427-431; BB 2009, 292-296; WM 2009, 316-321; ZGS 2009, 85-89; MDR 2009, 248-249; EuZW 2009, 155-159; JZ 2009 518-522; VersR 2009, 1504-1508; EuR 2009, 790-795; JR 2010, 22-26 Deutsch  Englisch 
Quelle AG/Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände EuGH, Urt. v. 17.4.2008, C-404/06, EU:C:2008:231 Deutsch  Englisch  Französisch 
Deutsch Deutsch
English Englisch
Francais Französisch
Chinese Chinesisch


Hyperlink int./ext. Verlinkung
Externer Link Externer Hyperlink
Status des Rechtsaktes
Aufgehoben Aufgehoben
Vorhaben Vorhaben
Inkraft Inkraft
Unbekannt Unbekannt
Deutsch Deutsche Fassung
Englisch Englische Fassung
Französisch Franz. Fassung
PDF-Datei Sonstige PDF-Datei
Dokument Sonstiges Dokument
Externer Link Externes Dokument

Table des matières

Verwendung von Cookies
Um unsere Webseite für Sie optimal zu gestalten und fortlaufend verbessern zu können, verwenden wir Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie der Verwendung von Cookies zu. Weitere Informationen zu Cookies erhalten Sie in der Datenschutzerklärung.
Einverstanden | Ablehnen